Freedom and Kant and modern practice "Declaration"

When the American people to express to the world the protection of fundamental rights for the country to war, · D · Franklin Roosevelt, in a speech delivered in January 1941 to discuss the theme of "Four Freedoms." It is said that the world is built on four basic human freedoms: freedom of speech and expression, freedom of every person to worship God, freedom from want, referring to the economic consumption, reduce the use of weapons of fear into freedom. (Franklin D Roosevelt, January 6 1941). Undoubtedly, the visual support as the largest national security should reach a long-term resident in Kant's philosophical system of domestic individual efforts of many aspects of the development of deep similarity theory, the German philosopher. Kant in the range of behavior patterns of social and political spheres of research, a free theme is a special priority, solidly living in social conventions and the natural evolution of the program. His theory emphasized that inherently rational human freedom is fully qualified, is infinitely powerful scientific and enforce the law society governance shaped root. The firm stressed that the concept of rational human behavior is compatible from a different perspective vividly embodies the declaration of human rights, a group of French citizens extensive efforts of the National Assembly. Substantially overlapping feeling stressed Declaration "," Roosevelt and Kant's theory, not coincidentally, prompted us to develop a serious thought to the overall business in the world today provide political stability, respect for the law and protect human rights. Generated from the focus multifaceted security privacy disputes, conflicts and powerful, it can provide an in-depth examination of the relevance of these philosophical points. In addition, by going beyond the surface and the plight of mining reasons, the basic political stance and reliable theoretical guidance to promote a more progressive approach, peaceful relations between the entities and the state.

As pointed out by Kant, freedom is defined as independence from another selected projection constraint forces, is the only birthright of human coexistence, in compliance with all other members of the "universal law." Wise philosopher consciously, actively against another widely accepted theory, but his eyes were born wrong, trying to welfare of citizens as a unique basis for national action. Establish their own edge position in the long political discussions, in Critique of Pure Reason, Kant is clear that there is no legitimacy should be recognized concept of happiness imposed on citizens of any conceptual (Kant, translated by Smith 1965). As explained, this assumption would mean that a country, citizens have the ability, in understanding what is truly beneficial for their lives enough damage equivalence. In order to put his ideas with home, Kant studies illustrate happiness, but also by generations of citizens in the pursuit of broad and lasting manner, and not specifically to include all types of people desire. Compared with the overwhelming adaptability free fitness restrict these desires quite by chance, which means heavily dependent on the situation, leading to the country as a result of well-being based on unreliable. Freedom, on the other hand, when placed in the field of political philosophy, concerned about the independence of the individual action is capable of as a solid foundation because of its unparalleled universality. Evaluated from the content and form two aspects, namely the inherent nature of real choice and freedom of the individual practitioner is the condition of possibility of unfettered freedom contain any specification of the total allowance. It can easily be understood by the fact that, able to withstand the test of universality and particularity, help freedom of choice as the basis for state control.

Principles emphasized Kant explains, in their way of life, should be based on individual approach to the imagination and the pursuit of happiness in the process of autonomy. Cause interference with the freedom of others lead to arbitrary will. Independent real meaning, however, he eventually developed at two levels: the majority of citizen participation, including women and children, in particular to determine the legal effect, as well as the basic law of the Society set in the social contract. Clearly, substantive proposals thoughtful recommendations Kant is widely reflected in the "Statement" specific details, initially advanced, a constant reminder of the purpose of the obligations, powers of legislation and enforcement rules. Similarly, the representative of France is responsible for determining the value of the article in political management and the "fundamental rights of human happiness irreplaceable role" of high value. Specific rights, it is possible to predict cause "public disaster" and the collapse of the government of abuse or neglect, it is straightforward to market. Reasons include equal rights, innate, to maintain "natural and imprescriptible" target of human rights, and to do things does not harm the freedom of others. In addition, the manuscript to recognize law enforcement functions of punishment over indirect damage Kant certainly, the general expression of the democratic law, strict to equal treatment under the rules and provisions of the law. Undoubtedly, the emphasis focused on the views and opinions free circulation, meaning not interfere with or infringe the interests of other people, clearly defined, before the condition is implicit in Kant. In addition, citizens, local representatives, ordinary citizens or government agencies can perform the right to freedom in a manner compatible with each other and the consensus.

It turned out that for centuries has been a revolution, a rich set of dramatic changes in the region are complex enough to completely and totally shocked followers of Kant "Declaration" of. Significant progress is convincing raise individual consciousness on the promotion of non-interference in the free way of life, function and application of law, and more effective government maintenance. At the same time, conflicts of interest are emerging, people insist on different views and different corners of the world to disrupt production, are catching up with the unprecedented attention and accelerate multi-Back fundamental questions about human rights and effective means of protection. All recent case attracted international attention and controversy technical invention and governmental actions in civil status, personal privacy and national security issues is undoubtedly the most popular prompted painful. Due to the presence of an information-rich digital storage device, a huge flow of information generated and spread in the network platform, thus providing opportunities for violent crime and vicious terrorist missionaries keep in touch, these tools promise. US intelligence professionals have the opportunity to acquire, select and disseminate various forms of information, which is considered to be a useful step to obtain intelligence to fight against hostile forces, by keeping the general public the information stored in the phone company or a third party organization. In this process, the main source of the charge is from the news of ordinary people, who used to complain, like "no authority" and "eavesdropping" invasion, condemn these acts are crossing the line of basic human rights and the erosion of privacy. In this regard, Robert Litt, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence General Council, in the assertion of the project legitimacy and approval by the full three departments, trying to reaffirm the US government's position. In his view, the public "national security and privacy is not a zero-sum (Robert Litt 2013)." Although privacy and national security companies should have the same weight, for adaptation, he declared, to "change the response of social expectations and norms." While the comprehensive protection of privacy indicate constraints intelligence community locate critical information, to a certain extent, complete access to the data, what is observed "useless" to ensure more appropriate control efforts. Summed up the cooperation and greater efforts are needed to ensure the safety of both sides and mutual satisfaction of the highest level.

A great victory and a lasting legacy from the Kantian theory of knowledge sharing and the "Declaration" is the truth, not satisfied to be achieved in terms of compliance with a law. And advocate more strongly implied that the Government strengthen and maximize the expression of personal will and the independence of the social structure, to strengthen and give. In recent years, similar cases so that privacy advocates and security spokesman has appeared in Germany and China, are made of some of their "whistleblower" activities. Combined with other types of the same nature, the relevant authorities and the powers and privileges of an upward trend over the steering large size of government there is no damage human right to freedom of suspicion. A reporter, Paul Luodao Lin said, "The US government is created by sovereign states, rather than the other way around (Paul Dowling, August 2015)" strongly remind us of an eternal meaningful formula again: Only when every citizen announced and fierce defense of their freedom, a country can achieve stability and unity, more willing to cooperate. Thus, regardless of race, ethnicity, or size of the problem, and to maintain respect for our own inherent right to freedom, not only our entire life of the enterprise, but a solid footing, and always effectively solve the many problems of the political situation , restricting human behavior.